Aging Plastic Surgery: How does invasive cosmetic surgery stand the test of time.

Despite a lengthy economic recession, cosmetic surgery is still on the increase throughout developed countries. What Roberta Honigman and David J Castle call the “looks industry” is alive and well. It seems everyone is doing it. It is a quick fix to a perceived embellishment.

But the fix might be more in the head than on the face.  Joshua Zimm, from the University of Toronto and his colleagues published a study in 2013 showing that facial cosmetic surgery does not significantly enhance attractiveness and only reduces perceived age by 3.1 years. So objective improvement is, at best, minimal.

The growth of cosmetic surgery is not a reflection of the increasing ugliness of people but a reflection of our increasing negative self-perception. The fact that cosmetic surgery is still increasing in popularity despite showing little positive outcome—objective measure of attractiveness or youth—points again to our desire to become perfect.

Body image is closely aligned to self-image and self-esteem. The sad part of this “looks industry” is that the problem is not how people look, but how they think they look. Because of this, surgery is often ineffective in changing this psychology.

The Norwegian researcher Tilmann M Von Soest, from the University of Oslo, followed 1,500 teenage girls for 13 years where 78 girls had cosmetic surgery. Those that had cosmetic surgery tended to have a history of poorer mental health for which cosmetic surgery showed no improvement. If the issue about our body image is a psychological one, and even when successful—and most people report that they are happy with the surgery two years on—the intervention will not change your negative self image. In severe cases of such negative self-image—body dysmorphic disorder—there is no surgical solution but psychological.

If you undergo any surgery when you are younger, the effect might look more unnatural since aging will include loss of skin elasticity and collagen, along with loss of skin fat across your body. You might have a newly formed nose but the rest of your face (and body) will be sagging.

In one such example of balance, Teri L. Hernandez and Robert H. Eckel of the University of Colorado, found that liposuction may slim one problem area but after a year it will create another problem area. Women who had fat suctioned from their thighs and lower abdomen ultimately put weight back on in often less flattering areas like the upper abdomen, back and arms. What we are learning is that the body controls the number of its fat cells as carefully as it controls the amount of fat. We need to work with the body to maintain healthy good looks rather than cutting it up.

There is no data on the number of repeated surgical procedures.  Because the problem is psychological, it is likely that most people will continue chasing their ideal image through surgery, until either their money or body gives up. At some point you will have to address the problem in your head.

© USA Copyrighted 2013 Mario D. Garrett

Intergenerational Conflict and the Addiction to Money

There is a social contract between generations that we learn to accept.

The contract simply states that we look after you until you grow up and then when you start working, you look after those who helped you. Sounds decent. Except that this social contract, when managed by politicians, translates into conflict for the obvious reason that administrators and politicians are addicted to spending money.

Back to the social intergenerational contract.

If the social generational contract was working why do we have such negative outcomes for children and older adults? In 2010 the 112th Congress Senate introduced bill 294 highlighting that Congress finds the following:
 (1) The United States ranks 17th in reading, 31st in mathematics, 23rd in science, and 18th in overall secondary education out of 36 developed nations, according to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
(2) According to data compiled by the OECD, in 2008 the United States had a child poverty rate of 20.6 percent, which  is the 4th highest child poverty rate of the 30 OECD countries that are ranked in this category...

In 2011 we now have a child poverty rate of over 22% with single parents with children having the third highest rate among all OECD countries.We are losing ground.

This is not a successful intergenerational contract. But the litany of woes continues.

Once our children mature and start going to college, there are other pitfalls that do not exist for children in other developed countries. Of the 20 million students that attend college every year in the US, close to 12 million borrow to help cover costs. The August 2013 Federal Reserve Statistics student loans amounted to $1,178 Trillion. Student loans are hovering around $100 Billion a year in new loans per year. Students in the US owe more than the total GDP of over 180 countries and territories (out of 194).

It surprises Europeans to learn that this cost is in addition to state funds that contribute more than $1,060 per student per 3-unit class. An enviable sum for any Country offering free education. All this cost ensures that from infants, to children, to adolescents to adulthood young Americans are enslaved in an economic stranglehold.

From the very young to young adults, between 25%-50% of  Americans are destined to remaining in poverty, becoming debt ridden or electing to be uneducated and join the daily cycle of minimum work at $8:50 an hour.

So the social intergenerational contract is not working so well for our children. But at least, for older adults in the USA, there is some benefit to the social intergenerational contract.

Back to the social intergenerational contract.

We need to examine the federal figures more closely for this one.

The most successful social programs in the US has been the introduction of Social Security in 1935. Social Security has been instrumental in lowering poverty levels among older adults. But if we look at the metrics—without denying the comparative improvement of welfare of millions of older adults—the improvement does not translate to economic security in older age.

The 2010 Current Population Survey reported 43.6 million people living in poverty—the largest number in the 51 years for which poverty estimates have been published. Surprisingly, the same report shows that between 2008 and 2009, poverty increased for children under age 18 (from 19.0 to 20.7 percent) and people aged 18 to 64 (from 11.7 to 12.9 percent), but decreased for older adults (from 9.7 to 8.9 percent).

The federal poverty level was defined by Mollie Orshansky between 1963-1964 while she was working for the Social Security Administration. Ms Orshansky used the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s economy food plan for families of three or more persons and multiplied the costs by a factor of three. A sensible enough metrics in 1960s.

Fast forward to 2013. The US is very different from the US of 1960s. The poverty metrics does not take into account housing costs, differences in living expenses across the country, child care, health care costs, medications and transportation.  National Academy of Science developed a new formula to account for these changes. And in January 2011, the federal government officially but reticently acknowledged the need to improve the outdated federal poverty level by releasing a ‘Supplemental Poverty Measure.’

The new index, now known as the Elder Index, was calculated by the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research on behalf of the Insight Center for Community Economic Development, and Wider Opportunities for Women. The Elder Index shows that the cost of living for most US older adults far outpaces the Federal Poverty Level. The Elder Index estimates that 18.6 percent of Americans over 65 live below the poverty line, which translates to 6.8 million older adults. This index is more accurate than either the antiquated Federal Poverty Level or the Supplemental Poverty Measure because it takes into account the costs of child care, health care and transportation. 

How can this happen when the US planned for the aging of the baby boomers? Ronald Reagan established the 1982 Commission to study and make recommendations to Congress on how to solve the Social Security obligations when the baby boomers mature. The venerable Alan Greenspan chaired the Commission. The recommendations, which become law in 1984, was for a major payroll tax hike to generate Social Security surpluses for the next 30 years, in order to build up a large reserve in the trust fund that could be drawn when the boomers become retirees—which is now. This created a massive surplus of $2.7 trillion.

Unlike other countries in the world, the United States is alone in that the surplus is spent, every cent, every year. There is even a law to stop Congress from doing this. The Budget Enforcement Act—Section 13301—made it illegal for Congress to use Social Security funds by excluding Social Security from all budgets including the congressional budget. However the intent of the law is ignored.

The 2013 Social Security Trustees Report states that "Redemption of trust fund bonds, interest paid on those bonds, and transfers from the General Fund provide no new net income to the Treasury, which must finance these payments through some combination of increased taxation, reductions in other government spending, or additional borrowing from the public." This means that these are no bonds that could be sold. In order to pay this money back the government will have to raise, borrow, or print additional monies to honor them.

The "special issue Treasury Bonds" are not bonds, because they cannot be bought, sold or bartered, but simply IOUs that Congress is NOT obligated to pay back. There are Supreme Court decisions, especially the 1960 Flemming v. Nestor. where the Court denied Nestor's benefits even though he had contributed to the program for 19 years and was already receiving benefits. The decision states that there is no obligation for the federal government to honor its commitment to provide social security regardless of your contribution. It is an entitlement as long as we say it is.

Back to the social intergenerational contract.

On the younger generational side there is Infant mortality, child poverty, educational debt encumbered, while on the older adult side we have an increasing number experiencing poverty--despite Social Security--and  a Congress that has expropriate--illegally under Section 13301--all of our Social Security Trust Funds. Older adults insurance no longer exists.

Lets look at the social intergenerational contract again.

Intergenerational "conflict" is a product of abuse of funds. It is a creation of politicians and administrators who abuse the implicit agreement we have across generations. When we allow for this to happen--for administrators to expropriate our investment--then we allow for our society, our community, to fend for itself. There are no safety nets. How did we get to this place and what are some of the solutions?

We got to this place because we keep being distracted by peripheral issues that have no significance to our well being. Whenever there is an issue that hits at the core of our being, our civic society, we are distracted by jingoism and national pride or petty politics. The solution is education. Not a radical idea, but one that sounds simpler than it is. Education, not in a formal sense of going to college (which we should if we can afford it or have that inclination) but in terms of being open to discussing everything. To fight for an truly open society. To invest time to understand the issues and not to settle for sound bites. This is hard. Attend a council meeting. Participate. You do not have to say anything, just listen and be aware.

© USA Copyrighted 2013 Mario D. Garrett

Epigenetic and Dementia

Epigenetic is a process where so-called "dormant" genes are switched on or off in response to specific chemical triggers. The best example we have in aging is the increasing differentiation of identical twins—twins that developed from a single egg. In the 2005 proceedings at the National Academy of Science where a group of Spanish, Swedish, Danish, English, and American investigators report their study conclusions, it was reported that whereas young identical twin pairs are essentially indistinguishable in their epigenetic markings, older identical twin pairs show substantial variations. Resulting in increasing differences between the pair. This has been termed as “epigenetic drift” which is associated with aging.

Differences in gene expression among older twin pairs were some four times greater than those observed in young twin pairs. And the environment plays a significant role in this differentiation.  The more different the twins' upbringing, the greater the difference in their epigenetic makeup and observable differences between the two twins.  In some cases there is enough of a difference so that one twin gets dementia and the other does not. Although some genes have been identified for some early-onset forms of Alzheimer's disease, genes only explain 10-5% of diagnosed Alzheimer's disease, the rest remain unexplained and epigenetics might hold the answer.

Paul Coleman, from Sun Health Research Institute, in Arizona, looked at one set of identical twins—one who died of Alzheimer's disease, while the other twin died without Alzheimer’s disease. Coleman and his colleagues found that the twin that died from Alzheimer's disease not only had the characteristic disease in the brain but he also had less epigenetic activity (DNA methylation) indicating that this might be the reason for getting the disease in the first place. The twins attended the same schools and both worked as chemical engineers. However in their adult life, the one that died from Alzheimer's disease at the age of 76 was exposed to extensive pesticides at work, while the healthier twin worked in a different environment and died of prostate cancer at age 79.

Because there are so many factors involved in daily living, there is an issue in saying that the environment switches on/off specific genes that causes changes in the brain. However, emerging new results in dementia, are exposing examples where people with the disease—plaques and tangles throughout the brain—are escaping the expression of dementia. The only feasible answer is the possibility of epigenetic influences.

Epigenetic process has also been shown why certain diseases promote the expression of dementia A study by Jun Wang and her colleagues from New York Mount Sinai Hospital demonstrated that diabetes may bring about epigenetic changes. Having diabetes switches on a disease mechanism in the brain that makes the diabetic patient more prone to dementia. For the first time there is a study that shows why diabetic patients are at an increased risk of developing dementia. This new evidence, that diabetes might be the trigger to dementia, is a more likely cause given that approximately 60 percent of Alzheimer's disease patients have at least one serious medical condition associated with diabetes.
Epigenetics might hold the key in consolidating research findings that we could not explain before, while at the same time  provide a theoretical explanation of how environmental and external factors contribute to the expression of dementia.

© USA Copyrighted 2013 Mario D. Garrett

Childhood disability and Aging

Elo and Preston (1992) completed a review of the literature examining the effects of early life conditions on adult mortality. Their review begins with a discussion of the epidemiologic evidence for some of the major mechanisms whereby exposures and morbidity in childhood may have health consequences for adults. Initially, they examine a number of specific infectious diseases of childhood with well-documented, long-term health effects among adults (tuberculosis, hepatitis B, rheumatic heart disease) and then look at the growing literature suggesting that a number of chronic cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases may be related to a range of risk factors beginning in the intrauterine environment (e.g., intrauterine growth retardation) and extending through disease exposures and behavior patterns acquired in childhood (e.g., acute respiratory infections, dietary consumption of fat and salt). They examine other associations including a number of studies postulating that viral infections acquired in childhood may be linked to a wide variety of chronic diseases ranging from cancer to multiple sclerosis, juvenile diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, and presenile dementia, as well as the extensive literature linking short stature and adult mortality.
Childhood Precursors of Adult Morbidity and Mortality in Developing Countries: Implications for Health Programs
W.Henry Mosley and Ronald GrayPerinatal conditions

Low birthweight
Growth stunting, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Birth trauma, asphyxia, metabolic disorders
Brain damage, cerebral palsy, mental retardation
Congenital and perinatal infections

Hepatitis B
Liver cancer, chronic liver diseases
Syphilis
Blindness, deafness, paralysis, bone disease
Gonorrhea
Blindness
Infectious diseases of childhood

Tuberculosis
Tuberculosis
Rheumatic fever
Chronic rheumatic heart disease
Poliomyelitis
Residual paralysis
Trachoma
Blindness
Chagas’ disease
Heart failure
Schistosomiasis
Liver cirrhosis, general debility
Helicobacter pylori
Stomach cancer
Epstein-Barr virus
Nasopharyngeal cancer, Burkitt’s lymphoma
Nutritional deficiencies in infancy and childhood

Protein-energy malnutrition
Growth stunting, obstetrical complications, cardiovascular disease, chronic pulmonary diseases, intellectual impairment
Micronutrient deficiency

Iodine
Cretinism, intellectual impairment
Iron
Learning disabilities, intellectual impairment
Vitamin A
Blindness
Environmental hazards

Indoor air pollution
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lung cancer
Lead exposure
Intellectual impairment

Faith Leaders in End-Of-Life

Although we assume that faith leaders are experts in dealing with death, we might be surprised to find that they are not at all that comfortable with the topic. In master of science unpublished research conducted by three separate gerontology students at SDSU, we find that across all religions, faith leaders are poorly trained in end-of-life issues. Most faith leaders reported little to no formal training, and even those that have been exposed to some training admitted that they are ill-equipped to deal with end-of-life issues of their followers. And this finding was consistent for all religions studied.

We find the same story in other research. In a 2008 report by the Duke Institute on Care at the End of Life they also reported that faith healers were least comfortable and least prepared working with children, health care providers and providing grief support when death is unexpected. As you would expect, faith leaders reported being more comfortable with the rituals of their religion than with initiating discussions on end-of-life issues or training others to provide such support.

Kaye Norris and her colleagues, reported similar results from two separate 1997 studies. One is a Gallup survey which describes how people may not always receive the level of support and spiritual care they desire, which is not surprising since respondents in the survey also reported low expectations of clergy. This finding was supported by a survey from Missoula community--68 percent  describing themselves as religious or spiritual--that reported that people as they near life's end, are more likely to rely for support on in order of importance; a spouse, children, immediate family members or relatives, friends and than on a faith-leader or faith community.

Faith leaders' lack of education and training about end-of-life issues and grief counseling is an obstacle that prevents them from being more effective support to the dying and the bereaved. The surprise in the research is that all faiths seem to lack end-of-life training.

But at least the issue surrounding end-of-life has entered into a discussion. Especially around the highly divisive issue of assisted end-of-life. Some religions embrace the option. Such as the Unitarian Universalist, United Church of Christ, Evangelical Lutheran Church of America, Methodists, Mainline and Liberal Christian denominations, Episcopalian (Anglican) Unitarian, Methodist, Presbyterian and Quaker movements. Even the American Baptists Churches--in contrast to the Southern Baptist Convention--support the right to decide.

It is not that we should completely eliminate religion from any discussion relating to discourse about social issues as Sam Harris crudely argues in the 2004 book The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason. We need religion because people expect their religion to console them in moments of need. The issue is that with the medicalization of death there is a passive acceptance by faith-leaders that death is a medical event rather than a spiritual journey. They need to reclaim their right. They must however first re-learn about the complex issues surrounding end-of-life.

© USA Copyrighted 2013 Mario D. Garrett

Diversity and Elder Abuse

Abuse is legally defined. The law has exact definitions and boundaries about what is considered abuse. However in social settings, abuse is necessarily a relative term.  But ignorance of the law is no excuse.

Older adult law in California is unique in that if the government decides that a crime has been committed against someone who is 65 years and older--whether that older adult wants to or not--the government will prosecute. Elder abuse is not different from any other type of abuse. In some instances the victim might not understand the act of abuse, in most cases the abuser—the perpetrator—is a relative of the victim, and in some circumstances the victim does not want the abuse to be exposed. What is different in elder abuse is that the victim is an older adult.

Although all elder abuse victims are vulnerable, most are just ashamed that it happened to them and that a family member whom they trusted has so wronged them. Even with the belief across most cultures that older adults, especially mothers, should be honored--which Asian cultures calls filial piety--the practice is rapidly being abandoned and becoming...old fashioned.

The problem is that we have very little information about elder abuse in general and ethnic minorities specifically. The lack of information is primarily because lawyers are weary of sharing information about their clients, or allowing their clients to be researched since any evidence that is obtained can be subpoenaed by the defense. Also some of these incidents have a long history within the family.

In the late 1970s Suzanne Steinmetz  reported that half of abused children grow up to abuse their elderly parents. There seems to be a social learning component to elder abuse. If the situation at home promotes certain behaviors as acceptable then those behaviors will be reflected back at the aging parents. For lawyers, identifying that abused children are repeating learned behavior makes it that much harder to prosecute the case.

In addition, anecdotal evidence suggests that a majority of older adults have some early stage dementia, which makes them vulnerable and in some cases unable to cope with aggressive and insistent demands. How a court deals with the victims’ evidence in such cases is predictable which is why researchers and lawyers rarely collaborate.

Cultural differences bring an extra layer of consideration. Some ethnic groups, view families as a unit rather than as individuals and therefore deal with "common property" as such. There are also cultural norms in dealing with erratic behavior in families. The legal system does not acknowledge that there are different cultural impressions of what is defined as abuse. Different agencies keep different data, and reporting of abuse is not uniform across ethnicities.

Elder abuse is a growing torment in our society. It is so widespread that we fail to notice it because we ascribe such behavior to culture or, at least, to family idiosyncrasies. We also ascribe behavior as cultural, but it is likely to be a learned behavior rather than culture. There is no culture that allows for the derogation of our elders. And there is an urgency to elder abuse cases. The victims have a high--natural in most cases--mortality.

© USA Copyrighted 2013 Mario D. Garrett

Dementia and Sex in Nursing Homes

This affair was between an older couple. He was single, a bit of a ladies’ man in his younger time. She was still married but now separated. They met by chance. But they gravitated towards each other whenever they came across each other. They were often seen holding hands, and were relaxed and mellow when they were together. This older couple enjoyed moments of intimacy and friendship. If this was anywhere else it would elicit a smile. But this affair occurred in a nursing home and the couple suffered from dementia. 

In this case, the nursing home was the 120-bed Windmill Manor in Itoralville, Iowa. The man was 78, while the woman was much older at 87. Three and a half years of private litigation ended with the elderly couple becoming separated to different nursing homes and each died within a few years. While the administrator and the director of nursing home were both fired.

The issue is whether they had consensual sex and how you determine that.  The woman referred to her lover as her (living) husband. Was she confused and therefore agreed to have sex under a delusion.

The sad story here is that the law attempts to define edges. To enumerate a black and white picture in an otherwise blurred context. Sometimes we have to look at how unique individuals deal with such cases to find a moral or ethical compass. The law is too clumsy a tool for us.

Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor’s husband was suffering from dementia and was placed in a nursing home. While there he become romantically attached to another resident. Justice O'Connor decided that this made him happy and sanctioned their behavior. It takes courage to understand the disease for what it is., a disease. And sometimes how we react to people suffering dementia is more a reflection of our fears, prejudices and moral expectations, as much as it is about the degenerative disease itself.

It is not that these moral and ethnical dilemmas exist. It is that they are still dilemmas. In an age when the tsunami of dementia will push us more frequently against the reality of older adults with dementia we should have better tools than the law to deal with such radical changes in human intimacy. For some couples coping with dementia, physical intimacy continues to be a source of happiness. In others the dementia brings about behavioral changes that might increase or decrease the need for physical expression and relief. There might also be changes in sexual etiquette and expressions of sexual urges (or not). It is difficult to separate the person from the disease. But the disease can change the behavior of the person to such an extent that you cannot rely on past experience in responding to them.

By the time the person is in a nursing home, there are already noticeable changes in behavior. What this teaches us is not to rely on the law but to examine what the home will allow and what we are comfortable accepting.

© USA Copyrighted 2013 Mario D. Garrett