Dawn of the Age of Parrhesia

"Parrhesia" comes from the Greek playwright (tragedian) Euripides meaning literally "to speak everything" and by extension "to speak boldly", or "boldness". It is a form of extreme candor. It implies more than just freedom of speech, but the obligation to speak the truth for the common good, even at personal risk. 

Parrhesia was a central concept for the Cynic philosophers, and then later on applied by the Epicureans in a manner of frank criticism. This was a common method of discourse in philosophy at the time, which was later championed by the post modernist Michel Foucault. This was in contrast to rhetoric, which was a method to help persuade the audience. Rhetoric, the art of effective or persuasive speaking or writing, designed persuade and impress its audience. Often regarded as lacking in sincerity. In todays context some would (incorrectly) refer to it as fake news.

For the parrhesiastes--the one who uses parrhesia--they say everything that is on their mind, hiding nothing. By opening one's heart and mind completely to other people through their discussion, the speaker gives a complete and exact account of what they feel and think, unfettered by niceties or eloquence,  so that the audience is able to comprehend exactly what the speaker thinks. One who uses parrhesia must be critical of everything including themselves. They must also not bend to popular opinion or cultural norms, even if this endanger their life. Publicly the user of parrhesia must be in a subordinate to those being criticized. 

In todays world we are lost between the rhetoric and the false parrhesiastes. 

Those that tell the truth--parrhesiastes--are many, but they are necessarily individual. In a complex society, to be able to be fully knowledgeable and honest you have to be a specialist, an expert. Non experts are the rhetoricians. They persuade others that they are telling the truth but they truly do not understand the truth. And those are the rhetoricians. Unfortunately it is very difficult to tell them apart. So the knee jerk reaction is to disqualify all experts, Like a serpent that swallows its tail we have dismissed those individuals that can help us understand the truth.

The serpent that swallows its tail is the symbolism for alchemists. History can teach us the fate parrhesiastes. Alchemists were another set of individual experts that have been vilified throughout history.  While the symbol of Ouroboros--the snake eating its own tail--represent infinity and wholeness, it does have some strange bedfellows.

Reference

Foucault, Michel (Oct–Nov 1983), Discourse and Truth: the Problematization of Parrhesia (six lectures), The University of California at Berkeley.he parrhesiastes uses the most direct words and forms of expression he can find. 

Aging In Montclair and bevival

Aging In Montclair and bevival present Oct 20-22nd Aging in Montclair and bevival.com are proud to present the east coast debut of San Diego’s popular film event, Celebrating Aging In Film. Curated and moderated by series founder, aging expert and author, Professor Mario Garrett Ph.D., this three-day weekend event is designed to shed light on how the aging narrative is transforming our culture. For film enthusiasts, this weekend educational series is an exciting opportunity to watch four iconic films and participate in illuminating, post-screening discussions with two fascinating educators. Themes include multi-generational relationships, humor, culture, romance, and the enduring creative spirit.   Screening venues were made possible through the generosity of Montclair State University, School of Communication and Media, and the Montclair Art Museum. order your tickets now Celebrating Aging In Film Series and VIP Reception TICKETS + INFO aginginmontclair.org/film-series AIM Book Group bevival Instagram Copyright © 2017 Aging in Montclair, All rights reserved. You are receiving this email because you are a member of AIM. Thank you for your support! Our mailing address is: Aging in Montclair 13 Trinity Place The Salvation Army Building Montclair, NJ 07042 Add us to your address book Want to change how you receive these emails? You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.

Tuberculosis Has Been Shown to Cause Dementia

Tuberculosis has a long history with dementia and specifically Alzheimer’s disease, one type of dementia.

Tuberculosis (TB) is caused by a slow growing bacterium with the name of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The “myco” in mycobacterium refers to a thicker than normal cell wall. Because it grows slowly, TB spreads from person to person only through frequent and close contact. By breathing the bacterium, TB usually starts by attacking the lungs first and then spreads (seeding) to other parts of the body, including your kidneys, brain and spine. Wherever it seeds it damages the organ. In the kidneys it causes urine and blood in the urine (sterile pyuria), Pott disease (spondylitis) in the spine, hepatitis in the liver, lack of steroid hormones (Addison’s disease) in the adrenal gland, swelling in the neck (scrofula) in the cervical lymph nodes, and inflammation (meningitis) in the brain. Meningitis is the inflammation of the three membranes (meninges) protecting your brain and spinal cord. The tough outer membrane is called the dura mater, then the arachnoid and finally the delicate pia mater, the inner most layer that touches the brain. TB meningitis affects one in fifty cases of TB (much higher among children and those with HIV.) When these protective layers are attacked there are serious consequences to the brain.

The average survival with such TB–ridden brain was seven years, similar to the mortality span of Alzheimer’s disease. Most patients with Alzheimer’s disease typically die from infection or pneumonia and not cognitive decline—we will revisit this again later.

In 2010 Neil Anderson with Auckland City Hospital, New Zealand and his colleagues reported that people with TB meningitis had serious complications. Around a third suffered from a stroke, problems with eye/eyelid, pupil and lens, and epileptic seizures.  Around one in twenty suffered from the treatment itself (iatrogenic) through drug-induced hepatitis, while a fifth of the patients died early from the disease. For those that survive, one in ten had long-term cognitive impairment and/or epilepsy. With such dramatic complications it is surprising to realize how common TB remains to this day.

After HIV, TB is the major cause of death from a single infectious agent and is one of the top 10 causes of death worldwide with 1.8 million people dying from the disease in 2016. Drug-resistant strains of TB have already been identified in 105 countries including the U.S., and once infected, we cannot do anything but watch helplessly as the person dies.

But there is another twist to the story of this bacterium.

In 2017 Lawrence Broxmeyer with the New York Institute of Medical Research, undertook a historical review of how TB might have been the cause of Alzheimer’s disease even during Alois Alzheimer’s time. Broxmeyer argues that Alzheimer must have known this but elected to ignore it. By 2013 Francis Mawanda and Robert Wallace with the University of Iowa, reported that one of the prime suspects for Alzheimer’s disease was chronic bacterial infections like tuberculosis. The brilliant Oskar Fischer of the Prague clinic, a contemporary of Alois Alzheimer, noted this as well. The competition between Alzheimer’s Munich clinic (headed by Emil Kraepelin) and Fischer’s Prague clinic (headed by Arnold Pick) predestined animosity. And there was no collaborative effort to reconcile these observations about TB and Alzheimer’s disease. Instead the Munich clinic was out for glory and the creation of a “new” disease to enhance their legacy.

We continue discovering that there are many causes of Alzheimer’s disease. The disease is a reaction to these many traumas. In response to this trauma, studies are now strongly pointing to inflammation—a reaction to these traumas—that causes the damage to brain cells. Inflammation, seen as a penumbra on imaging techniques, is a shadow of dying cells in the brain. The question still remains how the inflammation—the penumbra—can be reduced and eliminated while for others the inflammation continues to grow nonstop. Each cause of dementia—for example, physical trauma from playing football or TB—will have its own pattern of progression. And this is the rub.

While federal funds are squandered on looking at the progression of the disease, the causes of dementia remain in the shadow of the research spotlight. The outcome of this ignorance is the utter lack of progress made in the last 100 years and the zero clinical outcomes from forty years of U.S. National Institute on Aging funding. Zero.

An alternate approach would be to focus on preventive measures. Not as sexy as “finding the cure” but we can guarantee success on day one. Diet and exercise, always a good strategy for a fulfilling life, is not enough. The low hanging fruit would involve protecting the head during contact sports and other activities where physical trauma eventually leads to dementia. Better vascular management, treatment and control are a second line of attack that will significantly reduce dementia rates. The third line of attack is to understand and control inflammation. It seems contradictory, but overall, in order to prevent dementia, research needs to move away from dementia and move again to basic science. Dementia is broader than what our focus has been so far. Historically politics dictated this narrow approach, but science is pointing in a different direction, but we seem to remain shackled to the past.

Emerging research shows that one type of trauma that causes dementia are bacteria, with TB being a very common bacteria agent among humans. But this is not just about “killing the bacteria.” Bacteria, and especially TB that we see today are not the same bacteria we saw a hundred or a thousand years ago. They have evolved with us. And they are still evolving and matching our development. We are evolving with them both as a species, as a community (different TBs across the globe) and as we age. This could (partially) explain why some people can control the spread of the penumbra, the inflammation, while others relent to its power.

Laura Pérez-Lago, from Madrid General Hospital and her colleagues found that there are many different types of tuberculosis bacterium within the same patient. They also found that individuals infected with TB might have genetics that promote TB to mutate. It seems that we continue co-evolving with the TB bacterium and some people allow for the bacterium to change within us while others restrict it from changing. Peng Yi-Hao, along with the China Medical University Hospital in Taiwan, looked at more than six thousand patients newly diagnosed with TB patients. Although patients that had TB were more likely to have other existing health problems—including; irregular heartbeat (atrial fibrillation), hypertension, diabetes, heart failure, stroke, depression, and head injury, all of which are correlated with increased risk for dementia—after controlling for these factors the overall risk of developing dementia in six years was higher, by an additional one person for every five in the non-TB patients. Among the patients with TB, men and people between 50 and 64 years were more likely to develop dementia compared to the TB-free group. Except for the patients with TB, those with a head injury exhibited the highest risk of developing dementia.

What seems to be emerging is that there is likely a genetic predisposition to allow TB to mutate and cause damage to many organs in the body, including the brain. Also with age we become more susceptible to TB and our inflammation response becomes a greater problem for the brain to cope with.

Nicholas Dunn with the University of Southampton, UK and his colleagues confirmed this point when they showed that elderly patients with dementia have a higher ratio of infection episodes in the four years preceding the diagnosis of dementia.  We become more prone to infections, which causes inflammation which harms us as we age.

The lesson that TB is teaching us is that we need to look at the many possible ways that the brain can be hurt. Focusing on the trauma that starts the cascade of inflammation is a sure bet to eventually be able to first understand the dementia and then perhaps cure it. Like cancer, dementia is neither simple nor static. The role of TB in causing dementia has waited too long to be given the importance it deserves.

© USA Copyrighted 2017 Mario D. Garrett  

References

Alvarez, P (1919). Relation between tuberculosis and dementia praecox. Dement. Praecox. Stud, 2, 1-2.

Amor, S., Puentes, F., Baker, D., & Van Der Valk, P. (2010). Inflammation in neurodegenerative diseases. Immunology, 129(2), 154-169.

Anderson, N. E., Somaratne, J., Mason, D. F., Holland, D., & Thomas, M. G. (2010). Neurological and systemic complications of tuberculous meningitis and its treatment at Auckland City Hospital, New Zealand. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 17(9), 1114-1118.

Broxmeyer, L. (2017). Are the Infectious Roots of Alzheimers Buried Deep in the Past?. Journal of MPE Molecular Pathological Epidemiology.

Castañeda-García, A., Prieto, A. I., Rodríguez-Beltrán, J., Alonso, N., Cantillon, D., Costas, C., ... & Tonjum, T. (2017). A non-canonical mismatch repair pathway in prokaryotes. Nature Communications, 8, 14246.

Dunn N, Mullee M, Perry VH, Holmes C. Association between dementia and infectious disease: evidence from a case-control study. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2005;19(2):91-94.

Eikelenboom, P., Hoozemans, J. J., Veerhuis, R., van Exel, E., Rozemuller, A. J., & van Gool, W. A. (2012). Whether, when and how chronic inflammation increases the risk of developing late-onset Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimer's research & therapy, 4(3), 15.

Garrett, M (2015) Politics of Anguish: How Alzheimer’s disease became the malady of the 21^st century. Createspace.

Glass, C. K., Saijo, K., Winner, B., Marchetto, M. C., & Gage, F. H. (2010). Mechanisms underlying inflammation in neurodegeneration. Cell, 140(6), 918-934.

Mawanda F, Wallace R (2013) Can infections cause Alzheimer's disease? Epidemiol Rev 35: 161-180.

Peng, Y. H., Chen, C. Y., Su, C. H., Muo, C. H., Chen, K. F., Liao, W. C., & Kao, C. H. (2015). Increased Risk of Dementia Among Patients With Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Retrospective Population-Based Cohort Study. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias®, 30(6), 629-634.

Pérez-Lago, L., Palacios, J. J., Herranz, M., Serrano, M. R., Bouza, E., & García-de-Viedma, Dario. (2015). Revealing hidden clonal complexity in Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection by qualitative and quantitative improvement of sampling. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 21(2), 147-e1. 

-->

Is Mouth Bacteria Causing Dementia?

In the 1897 fictional book War of the Worlds, H.G. Wells kills off the invading Martians and their gigantic robotic machines, by microbial infection. Two hundred years later we are just now appreciating the power of this microbial world.  We have been resisting studying how bacteria influence our behavior, including our mental health, in favor of the obvious low hanging fruit: a malfunction. Areas of study include the gut, but the best way to study bacteria is to look at it as it gets into our system through our mouth. [1]

In 2017 Kenji Takeuchi, with Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan and his colleagues reported that people in their 60s, who lost their teeth were more likely to get dementia five years later. And there was a dose effect, with fewer teeth the higher the rate of dementia, peaking at nearly twice as high. Only when older people completely had no teeth did this rate of dementia drop slightly.

What was interesting was that the same result was not found for vascular dementia—when dementia is caused by lack of blood supply to the brain. Having fewer teeth promoted dementia through something other than a problem with blood supply to the brain—the main cause of dementia.  Could this be the elusive cause of Alzheimer’s disease?

In a comprehensive review of periodontal disease and its relation to aging, the Brazilian Eder Abreu Huttner and Eduardo Hebling and their colleagues reported that although aging alone does not cause periodontal disease, aging does increase the risk by having less resilience, fostering conditions promoting the disease, and having a biological reaction that is more damaging than for younger people.

Controlling for other effects is difficult. For example Kenji Takeuchi also reported that teeth loss was related to having less than 10 years formal education.. After age, lack of formal education by itself remains the best predictor of dementia. Education has a protective function, perhaps delaying rather than eliminating dementia. Related to education is also income.  

In 2008 Nora Donaldson with King’s College London, and her colleagues reported data on 3,817 participants in the UK and found that social economic status had direct influence on the number of good teeth participants had. Richer people made better use of preventive care and also independently had better teeth. There is also a genetic component to teeth loss. With the main contender for dementia being the apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 gene we also find that this gene is also related to teeth loss. All of these factors can moderate and mediate the susceptibility to teeth loss.

Then in 2006 Margaret Gatz with the University of Southern California and her colleagues addressed these factors by using a Swedish study of identical twins. By controlling for most of these social and genetic factors, the authors report that the twin who had tooth loss before age 35 was 5.5 times more likely to develop Alzheimer’s disease. Tooth loss is directly involved in Alzheimer’s disease. We also observe that  centenarians—those that have lived to a 100 years and older—and their offspring have slight but significantly better oral health than their respective peers when they were in their early 60s.

Tooth loss can be caused by many factors, but the main contender seems to be periodontal disease. Periodontal disease is caused by bacteria that initially forms a sticky “plaque” which if not removed by brushing can harden and form “tartar” that attacks the gum causing “gingivitis” and eventually infects the tooth and bone as ”periodontitis.” The association of periodontal disease with dementia has been reported in many studies. In one recent 2017 review Yago Leira Feijóo and his colleagues with the University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain concluded that those with severe forms of periodontal disease are nearly three times more likely of getting dementia.

The cause of periodontal disease is primarily bacteria. But the story is more nuanced.  There are some 400 bacterial species populating the mouth in symbiosis with some viruses and maybe even fungi. A concoction that is also capable of invading the brain.  Although we still do not know how they get there. [2] It could be that the effect on the brain is indirect. Angela Kamer with the NYU College of Dentistry, and her colleagues proposes that it is likely that this mouth cocktail causes an inflammatory reaction throughout the body that also affects the brain.[3] But the brain also has traces of these microbes.

It is surprising to learn that the brain can be infected with the same microbial world that H.G. Wells wrote about 200 years ago. But unlike the story, in reality these microbes are killing humans instead of Martians. Autopsy studies find bacteria, fungi, viruses and a host of other microbial infections in our brain, especially among people that die with dementia. In 2011 Judith Miklossy confirmed these associations when she found that in four out of five autopsied brains of Alzheimer's patient there were spirochetal bacteria that originate in the mouth. [4]

In some cases these infections can be activated—both the rate of infection and the response—when the immune system is compromised through stress or other unknown mechanisms. This initial infection can cause inflammation in the brain and it is this inflammation that attacks the brain from inside. Ruth Utzhaki and her colleagues, in a 2016 review, came up with incontrovertible evidence that Alzheimer’s disease has a microbial component. Although always present, the authors report that this microbial world is woken up by an iron imbalance in the brain. An iron rich brain causes microbes to flourish, causing a reaction. There might be many such tipping points—that awaken this sleeping and toxic world—among older adults.

In fact the hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease—plaques and tangles—are observed in mice and in cell culture after an infection with herpes simplex virus or bacteria. These plaques and tangles have been found to have anti-microbial function against multiple bacteria, yeast and viruses. In response to a microbial world that exists around and within us. The World Health Organization estimates that 3.7 billion people under age 50 have the non-sexually transmitted herpes simplex virus infection globally. Around a third to half of all adults in developed countries have periodontal disease. So bacteria and viruses are already present, the issue is how does bacteria, in particular, invade and damage our brain.

Bacterial infection is not simple. With periodontal disease, bacterial infection is dependent on the presence of the infection together with the susceptibility of the individual, including a direct genetic susceptibility. However age seems to be the main reason why we become more susceptible to these infections. With greater susceptibility and immune deficiency, older adults are more likely to suffer bacterial infection that results in periodontal disease that promoted dementia. And this is bi-directional, as memory lapses, dental care is further ignored, increasing the continual onslaught of infection in the brain.  A central aspect of this theory is that there is a multiplying effect with the infection causing an initial inflammatory reaction in the brain, making it susceptible to more infection. [5]

Since the plaques and tangles are in fact not dead cells as presumed, but very much alive, the idea that the plaques and tangles—characteristic features of Alzheimer’s disease—are protecting the brain seems plausible. Despite the success of drugs eliminating these plaques and tangles there has been no improvement in cognition. As a result there is now enough evidence to accept that the plaques and tangles are a reaction to lesions in the brain rather than what Alois Alzheimer initially proposed as the disease itself. They are brain scabs caused by a brain lesion. Bacterial infection is such one of many such lesions that the brain has to contend with on a daily basis. Bacteria that enters the mouth and is cultivated through periodontal disease is an important sources of infection.

Overall these studies indicate that it is biologically feasible for oral bacteria to go through the bloodstream, reach the brain and either initiate or promote existing lesions and cause an inflammatory response. The brain reacts by protecting itself through inflammation and surrounding the toxic substance with plaques and tangles. If this inflammation mechanism is the cause of dementia then perhaps simple medication can lower the inflammation in the brain.

Jeffrey Rich with the Sentara Cardiovascular Research Institute, Norfolk, Virginia; USA and his colleagues conducted a follow-up study looking at the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)—include aspirin, ibuprofen, naproxen, COX-2 inhibitors, and other medications They found that the group using the NSAIDs had slower progression of the disease a year after initiating treatment. Although in a much later study, when they performed autopsies on these same patients, the authors reported that some had vascular dementia as well as Alzheimer’s disease (which diffuses the effect of inflammation on Alzheimer’s disease). However the results are still positive. In a review of the literature, the Dutch William van Gool and his colleagues make the argument that the body is maintaining a balance, that not all inflammation is bad, that some of the benefits of these medication might have nothing to do with inflammation and that the timing is important and they might only work at the early stages of the disease.

It seems that we are still on the periphery, searching for answers to a complex disease, in a piecemeal fashion, without coordination. Perhaps we are reaching our own tipping point in science and will have to admit that the body is a supraorganism. [6] The appreciation that other organisms live in harmony with and within us is a finely tuned symphony that aging has a way of disrupting.

© USA Copyrighted 2017 Mario D. Garrett  

This blog was initiated by a discussion with Peter Kraus.

___________________________________

[1]

It has long been known that there is a direct effect of oral bacteria such as Porphyromonas gingivalis and Streptococcus sanguis on induction of platelet activation and aggregation, which in turn contributes to heart disease such as atheroma formation and thrombosis. See earlier blog

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/iage/201305/aging-teeth

Also studies have consistently shown that mothers with significant periodontal disease had a 7.5 fold increase in the risk of having a preterm, low birth weight baby.
There is also a relationship between periodontal disease and diabetes, with improved metabolic control seen in poorly controlled diabetics following periodontal therapy.
The periodontal bacterium P. gingivalis has also been linked to rheumatoid arthritis through the enzyme peptidylarginine deiminase.

[2]

Among periodontal bacteria, species such as A. actinomycetemcomitans, P. gingivalis, T. denticola and F. nucleatum are capable of invading the brain. 

[3]

This reaction involves; cytokines—substances, such as interferon, interleukin, and growth factors, that are secreted by certain cells of the immune system and have an effect on other cells; and C-reactive protein (CRP)—substance produced by the liver that increases in the presence of inflammation in the body. CRP increases up to 1000 folds in acute inflammatory diseases. These cytokines and CRP stimulate glial cells to produce amyloid-β 1-42 peptide (Aβ42) and hyperphosphorylated tau protein (P-Tau).

[4]

But there is also an indication that the infection can also come from outside infection such as Lyme bacteria.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/iage/201705/the-coming-pandemic-lyme-dementia

[5]

Characterized by the production of high levels of inflammatory mediators such as IL-1, IL-6, IL-17 and TNF-α, and low levels of anti-inflammatory molecules such as IL-10

[6]

We are becoming Gods

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/iage/201511/we-are-becoming-gods

Geography of Aging and the Illusion of Self

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/iage/201505/geography-aging-and-the-illusion-self

References
Donaldson, A. N., Everitt, B., Newton, T., Steele, J., Sherriff, M., & Bower, E. (2008). The effects of social class and dental attendance on oral health. Journal of Dental Research, 87(1), 60-64.

Gatz, M., Mortimer, J. A., Fratiglioni, L., Johansson, B., Berg, S., Reynolds, C. A., & Pedersen, N. L. (2006). Potentially modifiable risk factors for dementia in identical twins. Alzheimer's & Dementia, 2(2), 110-117.

Itzhaki, R. F., Lathe, R., Balin, B. J., Ball, M. J., Bearer, E. L., Braak, H., ... & Del Tredici, K. (2016). Microbes and Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Alzheimer's disease: JAD, 51(4), 979.

Kamer, A. R., Dasanayake, A. P., Craig, R. G., Glodzik-Sobanska, L., Bry, M., & De Leon, M. J. (2008). Alzheimer's disease and peripheral infections: the possible contribution from periodontal infections, model and hypothesis. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 13(4), 437-449.

Leira, Y., Dom’nguez, C., Seoane, J., Seoane-Romero, J., P’as-Peleteiro, J. M., Takkouche, B., ... & Aldrey, J. M. (2017). Is Periodontal Disease Associated with Alzheimer's Disease A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Neuroepidemiology, 48(1-2), 21-31.

Miklossy, J. (2011). Alzheimer's disease-a neurospirochetosis. Analysis of the evidence following Koch's and Hill's criteria. Journal of neuroinflammation, 8(1), 90.

Rich, J. B., Rasmusson, D. X., Folstein, M. F., Carson, K. A., Kawas, C., & Brandt, J. (1995). Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in Alzheimer's disease. Neurology, 45(1), 51-55.

Ridley RM, Baker HF, Windle CP, Cummings RM. Very long term studies of the seeding of beta-amyloidosis in primates. J Neural Transm. 2006;113:1243-1251
Sochocka, M., Sobczy_ski, M., Sender-Janeczek, A., Zwoli_ska, K., Bachowicz, O., Tomczyk, T., ... & Leszek, J. (2017). Association between periodontal health status and cognitive abilities. The role of cytokine profile and systemic inflammation. Current Alzheimer research.

Stein, P. S., Scheff, S., & Dawson, D. R. (2006). Alzheimer’s disease and periodontal disease: mechanisms underlying a potential bidirectional relationship. Grand Rounds Oral-Sys Med, 1(3), 14-24.

Takeuchi, K., Ohara, T., Furuta, M., Takeshita, T., Shibata, Y., Hata, J., ... & Ninomiya, T. (2017). Tooth Loss and Risk of Dementia in the Community: the Hisayama Study. Journal of the American Geriatrics

Immortality: With a Lifetime Guarantee

Immortality:
With a Lifetime Guarantee

Survival is our final ambition as a species and the only way to survive is to ensure that we are a good fit in our environment. There are two ways to survive as a species. One is to produce an enormous number of offspring and hope that a few survive long enough to pass on their genes. Another approach—one that humans are following—involves having a few children whom we nurture for more than 18 years. Nurturing is an important—and integral—component of our survival strategy. Nurturing involves having things to teach and living long enough to be able to teach them. This involves having a larger brain and longer life—and the two go together. Aging is not a dustbin of genetics, but an integral part of our strategy for survival as a species. With aging also comes the opportunity to learn about the environment. We learn in terms of our skills and also through our biology. As we age we pick-up new genetic material, modify existing genes, and fine-tune them before we pass our genes on to our children. Our lives are devoted to just this aim, except we remain ignorant of this fact for good reason. We create a model of reality in our brain. For us to engage in the world we have to be at the center and we have to believe that we are unique and have a free will. Our impression of reality, dictated by having a world that is just, fair and constant, also requires that we do not think about our own death or our model of the world becomes untenable. This is where our belief in immortality comes in. We want things to stay constant so that we can retain some level of control. Anticipating our death destroys this impression that the world is orderly and just. But there is one problem with this made-up reality, we do eventually get old, frail and die. We point at aging as the culprit. Aging is the problem that we need to solve rather than a survival strategy.  But if we understand aging we will understand the tricks of our psychology. By looking across ecological biology, genetics, biology and anthropology we can form an understanding of how aging came about as a positive attribute. With aging came a whole new dimension of human development. A life-long symphony is playing, that has a beginning, a middle and an end.  It is not just about tweaking genetics, or taking supplements, or curing aging. Our aging is an integral part of our environment and our history. We are meant to die, as much as it is detrimental to the individual, aging and death form our strategy as a species. Our personal salvation is that we delude ourselves this reality.

https://www.createspace.com/7082507

The Coming Pandemic of Lyme Dementia

There are many known causes of dementia. One of these causes are bacteria. Bacteria are usually ignored despite its historical and current significance in dementia research.  A hundred years ago it was well known that syphilis—a bacterium—was the only known cause of dementia. The bacteria interferes with the nerves until it reaches the brain where it destroys the brain from the inside. In the end, the expression of long-term syphilis is dementia—Neurosyphilis. Alois Alzheimer wrote his post-doctoral thesis (Habilitationsschrift) entitled “Histological studies on the differential diagnosis of progressive paralysis.” on neurosyphilis before his supervisor Emil Kraepelin propelled him into the history books by defining Alzheimer’s disease as a new disease in 1911. [1]

Neurosyphilis was very common in the 1900s. Between one in four to one in ten people in mental institutions were there because of neurosyphilis. Eventually syphilis kills its victims. Before the introduction of penicillin in 1943, syphilis was a common killer. In 1929, among men, the death rate from syphilis was 28.3 per 100,000 for Whites and 97.9 per 100,000 for Blacks [2]. The similarities between syphilis and dementia were addressed repeatedly in the early literature in Alzheimer’s disease [1]. Because syphilis can now be treated easily and cheaply, it has nearly been eradicated. But there is a new bacterium threat emerging—one that can also cause dementia.

Today, the main bacterial threat to acquiring dementia comes from Lyme disease—a bacterium borrelia burgdorferi. Lyme disease is transmitted to humans through the bite of infected blacklegged tick. These ticks are themselves infected by feeding off diseased insects and birds, which bring the infection from across the globe. Worldwide there are 23 different species of these Lyme disease-carrying ticks.

Lyme disease is the most common disease transmitted by animals in the northern hemisphere and it is becoming an increasingly public health concern [3]. Not only because Lyme disease is a debilitating disease, but because eventually Lyme disease has been shown to cause dementia—Lyme dementia [4]. Science has not identified the mechanism for the development of Lyme dementia. The American psychiatrist  Robert Bransfield has been documenting some of its neurological expressions, but so far there is a lack of emphasis in the research community on exploring these clinical features. There is great resistance by the U.S. Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to acknowledge the importance of this infection.

Ernie Murakami, a retired physician, has been monitoring the spread of Lyme disease across the world. With more than 65 countries that have the blacklegged ticks which transmit Lyme disease. This is a worldwide pandemic.The prevalence of Lyme disease reporting varies dramatically, primarily we are not looking for it.  Canada reporting the lowest cases in the world, with 1 case per million, while Slovenia reports 13 cases per 10,000. In the United Sates the CDC reports that more than 329,000 people are likely to be infected every year in the U.S. alone. Only one in ten cases are reported since clinicians are not looking for Lyme disease. This estimated number of annual infections is higher than hepatitis C, HIV, colon cancer, and breast cancer. Lyme disease accounts for more than 90% of all reported cases of diseases transmitted by animals (vector-borne illness).

With any good public health strategy there needs to be a two pronged response--prevention and control: addressing the clinical effects of the disease and the underlying cause. In the United States, although there are minimal research funds to examine and explore cures for Lyme disease, this avenue is likely to see the most significant increase in funding. But this would be folly without addressing the underlying cause of the disease. Addressing these underlying causes will however be challenging.

Harvard Medical School Center reports that areas suitable for tick habitation will quadruple by the 2080s. But there are more pressing changes that will happen in our lifetime. Deforestation and climate-induced habitat change are affecting insect which carry diseases like malaria and Lyme disease. Slow climate change, urban growth in areas next to forests, reforestation following the abandonment of agriculture, and increases in the deer, mice and squirrel populations (among many others) which harbor these ticks.

Malaria and Lyme disease are both projected to increase. Even taking a more conservative estimate (all of the USA, most of Canada, all of Europe, Middle East and China), more than half the world’s populations are exposed to Lyme disease. A proportion of these populations will become infected with Lyme disease and eventually some will develop dementia. Pure Lyme dementia exists and reacts well to antibiotics [4].  Is public health ready to address this?

© USA Copyrighted 2017 Mario D. Garrett 

References:

[1] Garrett MD (2015) Politics of Anguish: How Alzheimer's disease became the malady of the 21st century. Createspace. USA.

[2] Hazen H.H. (1937). A leading cause of death among Negroes: Syphilis. Journal of Negro Education, 310-321.

[3] Pearson S. (2014). Recognising and understanding Lyme disease. Nursing Standard, 29(1): 37-43.

-->

[4] Blanc F., Philippi N., Cretin B., Kleitz C., Berly L., Jung B., ... & de Seze J. (2014). Lyme Neuroborreliosis and Dementia. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 41(4): 1087-93.